Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) is the ability of learners to control their learning by setting goals, planning strategies, monitoring progress, and adjusting their approach based on results. It is an essential skill for students because it allows them to take responsibility for their education and develop independent learning habits. Many researchers have studied SRL and proposed different models to explain how students regulate their learning. Some of the most well-known models include Zimmerman’s Socio-Cognitive Model, Boekaerts’ Dual Processing Model, Winne and Hadwin’s Metacognitive Model, Pintrich’s Motivational Model, Efklides’ Metacognitive and Emotional Model, and Hadwin, Järvelä, and Miller’s Collaborative SRL Model. Each model presents a unique perspective on SRL, focusing on different aspects such as motivation, emotions, metacognition, and collaborative learning.
Zimmerman’s Socio-Cognitive Model of SRL
Barry Zimmerman introduced a socio-cognitive model of SRL, highlighting the interaction between personal, behavioral, and environmental factors in learning. He proposed that SRL occurs in three phases: the forethought phase, where learners set goals and plan strategies before starting a task; the performance phase, where they implement strategies and monitor their progress; and the self-reflection phase, where they evaluate their performance and adjust their strategies for future learning.
Zimmerman’s model is based on the idea that learning is an active and cyclical process, where students constantly refine their approaches based on feedback and results. This model emphasizes the importance of motivation, as students who believe in their ability to learn are more likely to engage in self-regulation. For example, a university student preparing for a math exam may set a goal to complete ten practice problems per day, monitor their progress through self-quizzing, and adjust their study plan based on their performance on mock tests. If they find that certain types of problems are more challenging, they might spend additional time reviewing those topics. This iterative process is key to effective learning, and Zimmerman’s model provides a framework for students to develop these skills.
Boekaerts’ Dual Processing Model of SRL
Monique Boekaerts developed the Dual Processing Model of SRL, which focuses on the role of emotions in learning. Unlike Zimmerman’s model, which highlights a structured cycle of self-regulation, Boekaerts emphasizes how emotions and motivation influence the way students approach learning tasks. She describes two distinct learning pathways: the top-down pathway, where students are highly motivated and actively set goals to direct their learning, and the bottom-up pathway, where emotions such as anxiety or frustration interfere with learning.
Her model acknowledges that students do not always approach learning rationally or efficiently. Sometimes, a student may have the skills and resources to succeed but still struggle due to emotional barriers. For example, a high school student who enjoys science may actively engage in experiments, seek additional resources, and set goals to improve their understanding. However, another student who has experienced repeated failure in science may feel anxious about the subject and avoid studying, leading to a cycle of poor performance. Boekaerts’ model highlights the importance of emotional regulation in learning and suggests that educators should help students develop strategies to manage stress and frustration, thereby enabling them to engage in SRL more effectively.
Winne and Hadwin’s Metacognitive Model of SRL
Philip Winne and Allyson Hadwin developed the Metacognitive Model of SRL, which focuses on the role of metacognition in learning. Their model emphasizes that students must actively monitor and control their thinking processes. They describe four stages of learning: understanding the task, setting goals and planning strategies, using strategies while monitoring progress, and evaluating outcomes to adapt to future learning. Unlike Zimmerman’s model, which focuses on motivation and self-reflection, Winne and Hadwin highlight the importance of metacognitive awareness, where students consciously think about their learning strategies and adjust them as needed.
For instance, a college student writing a research paper might start by analyzing the assignment requirements, planning a timeline, and selecting sources. While drafting the paper, they may monitor their understanding by rereading sections and checking whether their arguments align with the thesis. After submission, they may reflect on feedback from the instructor and adjust their writing strategies for the next assignment. This model reinforces the idea that self-regulated learners are not just passive receivers of information but active participants in shaping their learning experiences.
Pintrich’s Motivational Model of SRL
Paul Pintrich expanded on Zimmerman’s work by placing a stronger emphasis on motivation in SRL. While Zimmerman acknowledged the influence of motivation, Pintrich categorized motivation as one of the four essential areas of SRL, alongside cognitive strategies, metacognitive strategies, and behavioral control. His model suggests that motivation is not just an additional factor in SRL but a driving force that influences how students engage with learning tasks.
For example, a student who is intrinsically motivated to learn a new language will likely use effective cognitive strategies such as repetition, note-taking, and conversation practice. They will also engage in metacognitive strategies, such as assessing which methods work best for them and making adjustments accordingly. On the other hand, a student who lacks motivation may struggle to engage in SRL, even if they have the necessary skills. This highlights the importance of creating learning environments that foster motivation, whether through goal-setting, rewards, or fostering a sense of competence and autonomy.
Efklides’ Metacognitive and Emotional Model of SRL
Anastasia Efklides proposed the Metacognitive and Emotional Model of SRL, which bridges the gap between metacognition and SRL. While Winne and Hadwin focus primarily on cognitive regulation, Efklides introduces the concept of metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive experiences, which shape how students regulate their learning. Metacognitive knowledge refers to what learners know about their abilities, strategies, and tasks, while metacognitive experiences involve their awareness of cognitive processes and emotional responses during learning.
For example, a student preparing for a speech may recognize that they struggle with public speaking (metacognitive knowledge) and experience nervousness during practice sessions (metacognitive experience). Based on this awareness, they might choose to rehearse more frequently, seek feedback, or practice relaxation techniques. Efklides’ model emphasizes that successful SRL requires not just planning and strategy but also self-awareness and emotional management.
Hadwin, Järvelä, and Miller’s Collaborative SRL Model
Unlike the previous models that focus on individual learning, Hadwin, Järvelä, and Miller explore how SRL operates in collaborative learning settings. Their model introduces the concepts of co-regulation, where learners assist each other in managing learning, and shared regulation, where a group collectively sets goals, plans strategies, and monitors progress.
For instance, in a group project, students may distribute tasks, track each other’s progress, and adjust plans based on team feedback. This model is particularly relevant in today’s education system, where collaborative learning and teamwork are emphasized. It highlights that SRL is not just an individual skill but also a social process that requires communication, negotiation, and collective problem-solving.
Comparison and Contrast of SRL Models
Each SRL model provides a unique perspective on how students regulate their learning, though they share common themes such as goal-setting, self-monitoring, and adaptation. Zimmerman’s Socio-Cognitive Model and Pintrich’s Motivational Model focus on motivation, while Winne and Hadwin’s Metacognitive Model and Efklides’ Metacognitive and Emotional Model emphasize cognitive and emotional regulation. Boekaerts’ Dual Processing Model highlights the impact of emotions, while Hadwin, Järvelä, and Miller’s Collaborative SRL Model expands the discussion to social and group learning dynamics.
While Zimmerman and Pintrich view motivation as central to SRL, Winne and Hadwin focus on how students monitor and adapt their learning strategies. Boekaerts introduces emotional factors, which are often overlooked in traditional cognitive models. Efklides’ model connects emotions with metacognition, filling an important gap. The collaborative model by Hadwin, Järvelä, and Miller shifts attention from individual to group-based SRL, which is critical for modern education.
Self-Regulated Learning is essential for academic success, and different models help explain how students develop and refine these skills. By understanding these models, educators can support students in developing strategies for independent, motivated, and collaborative learning, ultimately leading to greater academic achievement and lifelong learning skills.
Photo by Dimitar Belchev on Unsplash